Where are people actually looking?

Demand is not published for individual properties. This rung stops aggregating places and draws the homes themselves, and every reading on this map is pooled across at least 5 people so that no one person's activity can be read out of it. A single property has no pool to hide in — "someone is watching this address" is the exact sentence the floor exists to prevent. Zoom out to a city view to read demand by locality.

Where are other buyers actually looking?

3 more readings, and 1 mode this map does not have — and why

Supply — see Explore: This is the same view as Explore, not a missing one. Supply is the listing count, Explore paints the listing count, and there is no second measure that would make them different pictures. Two chips producing a byte-identical page is a control that appears to do nothing, which reads as the page being broken rather than as the two being the same question.

Demand is 5 behavioural signals, weighted by how much intent each one shows, counted in distinct people and pooled so no individual can be read out of it.

Demand is not published at this zoom.

Zoom out to Locality

1 signal not counted — and why

Video engagement: This platform owns none of its video. All 13 clips play from the agents' own YouTube accounts in an embedded player, and an embed reports nothing back to the embedding site — watch time, completion and drop-off are measured by YouTube, for the channel owner, and `media.meta` carries no statistics on any of the 13 rows. The two ways to fill this are both real work with a real cost: pull public view counts through the YouTube Data API on the existing re-sync sweep (cheap, but it counts views from YouTube's own surfaces — people who never came near this site — so it is not Realty.tube behaviour and must never be labelled as such), or host video ourselves and measure playback directly (accurate, and a different platform). Until one of those is chosen, a video-engagement number here would be a guess with a percent sign.

Age not recorded · Based on all activity ever recorded · Based on available Realty.tube data

this platform's own recorded activity carries no usable timestamp, so how current this reading is cannot be stated. That is a gap in our records rather than a statement that it is old.

search_demand is cumulative — it holds running totals rather than per-period counts — so this reading covers everything ever recorded. It will not fall when interest falls, which is the property to know about it.

Based on available Realty.tube data — activity recorded on this platform and listings published on it. It is not a registry extract, a survey, or a national index, and it describes this platform's market rather than the whole market.

How this is calculated

Every signal is counted in DISTINCT PEOPLE (or the closest honest proxy — a device, a browser session, an account), never in events. Each count is multiplied by how much the action costs the person doing it — a search counts 1, an inquiry 12 — and the results are added. The bands compare that total with the other places published in the same view, so they are relative to what is on screen.

docs/DISCOVERY-SPINE.md §9 — Demand

Arameri

locality

Demand

Not published here

No signal here has 5 distinct people behind it. This is a privacy floor, not a statement that nothing is happening: a reading over three households in a village is a sentence about those households.

Not counted here6 of 6

Searches: Nobody here
Property views: Nobody here
Shares: Nobody here
Saves: Nobody here
Inquiries: Nobody here
Video engagement: No source

On the market here: 0
Demand per listing: Withheld

See what is listed here