Where are people actually looking?

4 of 120 places published · 270 below the 5-person floor (busiest shown)

Where are other buyers actually looking?

3 more readings, and 1 mode this map does not have — and why

Supply — see Explore: This is the same view as Explore, not a missing one. Supply is the listing count, Explore paints the listing count, and there is no second measure that would make them different pictures. Two chips producing a byte-identical page is a control that appears to do nothing, which reads as the page being broken rather than as the two being the same question.

Demand is 5 behavioural signals, weighted by how much intent each one shows, counted in distinct people and pooled so no individual can be read out of it.

Demandpeople, not events

Low
Medium
High
Very high

not published — under 5 people here

circle size = demand · number inside = listings

114 places in view are drawn without a name because the names would have overlapped at this zoom — each one is still in its mark’s tooltip, and zooming in gives them room.

Demand index 10 – 39 across 4 published places — the bands above are cut on that range, so they compare these places with each other · 270 places below the 5-person floor, shown grey

1 signal not counted — and why

Video engagement: This platform owns none of its video. All 13 clips play from the agents' own YouTube accounts in an embedded player, and an embed reports nothing back to the embedding site — watch time, completion and drop-off are measured by YouTube, for the channel owner, and `media.meta` carries no statistics on any of the 13 rows. The two ways to fill this are both real work with a real cost: pull public view counts through the YouTube Data API on the existing re-sync sweep (cheap, but it counts views from YouTube's own surfaces — people who never came near this site — so it is not Realty.tube behaviour and must never be labelled as such), or host video ourselves and measure playback directly (accurate, and a different platform). Until one of those is chosen, a video-engagement number here would be a guess with a percent sign.

Updated today · Based on all activity ever recorded · Based on available Realty.tube data

The newest observation behind this reading is from this platform's own recorded activity, today.

search_demand is cumulative — it holds running totals rather than per-period counts — so this reading covers everything ever recorded. It will not fall when interest falls, which is the property to know about it.

Based on available Realty.tube data — activity recorded on this platform and listings published on it. It is not a registry extract, a survey, or a national index, and it describes this platform's market rather than the whole market.

How this is calculated

Every signal is counted in DISTINCT PEOPLE (or the closest honest proxy — a device, a browser session, an account), never in events. Each count is multiplied by how much the action costs the person doing it — a search counts 1, an inquiry 12 — and the results are added. The bands compare that total with the other places published in the same view, so they are relative to what is on screen.

docs/DISCOVERY-SPINE.md §9 — Demand

Select an area

Choose a mark to see its demand broken down by signal — searches, views, shares, saves and inquiries, each with the number of distinct people behind it.

Bands in this view

Low demand10–17
Medium demand17–25
High demand25–32
Very high demand32–39

Bands are relative to the 4 places published in this view, from 10 to 39. Zoom or pan and they are recalculated — a place can be “very high” among its neighbours and “low” nationally, and both readings are true.

Demand against supply

Hot market1
More people looking than most places in view, less on the market than most. Demand this platform is not fully serving.
Bengaluru
Active market1
Busy on both sides — people are looking and there is stock to show them. A working market rather than a gap.
Krishna
Quiet market1
Few people looking and little on the market. Nothing is wrong here; there is simply not much happening either way.
West Godavari
Oversupplied1
More listings than most places in view, fewer people looking. Stock that is competing for attention that is not arriving.
Vijayawada

Cut at the medians of the 4 published places in this view: demand index 21, 3 listings. Both are relative — a place is “hot” compared with what else is on screen, so panning changes the answer and is meant to.

Busiest in view

KrishnaVERY HIGH DEMAND
Property views · Inquiries · Searches — 6 listings on the market here
BengaluruHIGH DEMAND
Property views · Saves · Searches — 1 listing on the market here
West GodavariLOW DEMAND
Property views · Saves · Searches — 1 listing on the market here
VijayawadaLOW DEMAND
Searches — 5 listings on the market here

Every place listed here clears the floor of 5 distinct people on at least one signal. Places below it are drawn on the map in grey and carry no reading. Rows are ordered by index points; the words are the bands those points fall in.